« Commvault and EqualLogic history | Main | Inside- Oustide and Netapp's new logo »

SAN protocols and Uber Networks

Chuck Hollis and Stephen Foskett have both blogged recently about storage protocols. I've certainly done my fair share of it too in the past. I'm not convinced people want a single network for all traffic - even if that's what they think they want today. Here's a one-handed vid of me rambling about it.

Categories:

Posted by Marc Farley on March 11, 2008 4:52 PM |

Comments (2)

Nik Simpson:

If you mean that organizations will want to physically separate block storage traffic from application traffic, I agree. Separation makes a lot of sense from many perspectives. However, I do believe the organizations want and need a single type of network infrastructure because of the management and cost benefits.

Posted by Nik Simpson | March 11, 2008 5:35 PM

Posted on March 11, 2008 17:35

marc farley:

Yes, that's what I mean Nik. Same technology, different implementations for different purposes.

Posted by marc farley | March 11, 2008 7:08 PM

Posted on March 11, 2008 19:08

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Search


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 11, 2008 4:52 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Commvault and EqualLogic history.

The next post in this blog is Inside- Oustide and Netapp's new logo.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type Enterprise